Wagner Custom Skis: Tailored Performance for You
Pete Wagner spent seventy days on the wrong skis before he noticed.
They were good skis, technically. The kind that earn favorable reviews in buyer’s guides, the kind that look smart in the shop, mounted and waiting. He’d done his homework – matched the length to his height, the width to his preferred terrain, picked a reputable brand. He strapped in, skied Telluride’s steep and varied terrain, and didn’t think much about it.
Then he tried a different pair. And realized he’d been fighting his equipment all season.
The revelation wasn’t subtle. It was the difference between forcing turns and flowing through them, between muscling through moguls and letting the skis do what skis are supposed to do. Wagner, a mechanical engineer who’d spent years designing custom golf clubs, had a background that made this moment particularly aggravating. He knew precision mattered. He knew equipment could be fitted to individuals rather than demographics. He knew the golf industry had cracked this problem decades ago.
The ski industry, apparently, had not.
The Problem Nobody Wanted to Solve
Wagner’s personal revelation was simple: most skiers have no reference point for what properly fitted equipment feels like. They assume the compromise is just how skiing works.
He’d spent years in the golf industry watching custom club fitting transform performance. Skis were more complex – more variables, more physics, more subjective feel – but the principle was identical. Match the equipment to the individual, not the individual to predetermined options.
Wagner brought his golf club fitting software to the major ski manufacturers around 2001. He’d spent seven years converting 300,000 lines of code from analyzing golf swings to analyzing skiing biomechanics and performance. The pitch: use data and algorithms to design skis for individual skiers.
The industry response was equally straightforward: no thanks.
Custom fitting meant complexity, inventory headaches, longer lead times. Ski companies had a model that worked, and this wasn’t it.
So Wagner, with an MBA from the University of Colorado and a small group of investors, built his own factory in 2006.
Skier DNA: The Algorithm That Shouldn’t Work
Custom Artwork Topsheets
The questionnaire takes about three minutes. Height, weight, age, ability level, preferred terrain, skiing goals. A phone conversation with one of Wagner’s designers adds context – what you liked or hated about previous skis, how you want your next pair to feel, whether you’re skiing Northeast ice or Colorado powder or Tahoe’s schizophrenic conditions.
This feeds into Wagner’s Skier DNA software, which outputs specific recommendations: length, width, sidecut radius, tip and tail shape, camber profile, rocker configuration, flex pattern, torsional rigidity. Then the material selections: core construction, layup schedule, base material, edge specification, sidewall design.
The result is a ski that exists nowhere else. Not “customized” in the sense of picking from predetermined options, but actually designed from scratch using your specific parameters.
The skeptical question is obvious: can an algorithm really capture something as variable and subjective as how someone skis?
The answer, according to Wagner’s clients, appears to be yes – but not because the algorithm is magic. It’s because Wagner spent nearly two decades calibrating it with real data from real skiers. Every pair of skis that goes out generates feedback. What worked, what didn’t, what the skier loved, what they’d change. That information refines the model. The algorithm gets smarter with each iteration.
It’s the same methodology that made custom golf club fitting work – collect enough data about enough individuals, and patterns emerge. You can predict, with reasonable accuracy, how a skier with certain physical characteristics and style preferences will respond to certain ski geometries and construction methods.
The Materials Question
A pair of Wagner custom skis starts around $2,000. The Hero’s limited edition, built with reclaimed Engelmann spruce from Aspen Mountain’s recent expansion, runs $3,500 with bindings. Wagner’s Factory line, which offers pre-designed models customized for flex and graphics, costs less but still significantly more than mass-market skis.
The price makes sense once you understand what goes into the construction.
Start with the edges. Wagner uses oversized, hardened steel edges on every ski. Not because it’s marketing-friendly, but because edges are the component most likely to fail on a ski that’s actually used. Hit enough rocks, ski enough icy groomers, and standard edges wear down or crack. Oversized edges can be tuned more times before they’re compromised. More tunes equals longer ski life.
The bases are extra thick for the same reason. More base material means you can repair core shots and still have something left. Given that stone grinds remove material every time you tune the skis, this matters more than it sounds.
The cores are predominantly wood – usually aspen, occasionally other species depending on the desired flex. Wood is lighter than synthetic alternatives and has natural damping properties that metal and foam cores struggle to replicate. It’s also recyclable, which aligns with Wagner’s engineering-driven environmental philosophy: build things that last, use materials that don’t end up in landfills when they finally wear out.
The arrangement of fiberglass, carbon fiber, or titanal layers around the core varies based on the ski’s intended use and the skier’s preferences. Wagner keeps more than 2,500 material combinations in their design system. Want a damp, stable ski for charging hard snow? Titanal layers provide that. Want something lighter and more playful for trees and bumps? Carbon fiber offers torsional stability without the weight.
These choices aren’t about premium materials for their own sake. They’re about building skis that perform specifically for one person and last longer than the typical three-season replacement cycle.
The Factory That Runs on Sunshine
Wagner’s production facility sits in Telluride’s Mountain Village, near the base of the ski resort. The shop runs entirely on solar and wind power – a 3.1-kilowatt photovoltaic array on the roof supplemented by energy from the Last Dollar Community Solar Garden.
This wasn’t virtue signaling. It was Pete Wagner doing engineer math.
The factory needed to be climate controlled for consistent epoxy curing. It needed power for milling machines, presses, grinders. Wagner looked at the energy costs and decided renewable made more economic sense than paying the local utility forever.
It’s the same logic that drives the material choices: front-load the investment in quality and efficiency, reap the benefits over time. The solar installation cost more upfront than grid power would have. But over the life of Wagner Custom Skis as a business, it pays for itself while eliminating the factory’s carbon footprint.
The sustainability argument extends to the skis themselves. A pair of Wagners, properly maintained, can last a decade or more. Compare that to skis designed to be replaced every few seasons, and the environmental math shifts considerably. Fewer skis produced means less material consumed, less energy used, less waste generated.
When those Wagners do finally reach end of life, the wood cores and metal components can be recycled. The carbon fiber and fiberglass are harder to recycle, but Wagner sources locally when possible and minimizes scrap through precise cutting and layup processes.
None of this appears in marketing materials because it’s not the point. The point is building skis correctly, which happens to align with building them sustainably.
Who This Makes Sense For
Wagner produces roughly 1,000 pairs of skis per year. Six pairs on a busy day, each one completely different from the last. Every ski gets a photo emailed to its owner with the subject line: “Your skis were born today.”
Pete Wagner often answers the office phone himself. Customers call with snow reports from Vermont, questions about base wax, updates on how their skis are performing. This isn’t scale. This is the opposite of scale.
The clientele breaks into two rough categories. First: serious skiers who’ve tried enough different equipment to know what they like and hate, who have specific preferences about how a ski should feel, and who are willing to pay for something that matches those preferences exactly. Ski instructors. Guides. Patrollers. People who spend 70+ days per season on snow and want equipment that works with them rather than against them.
Second: skiers who’ve had an injury or physical limitation that makes standard equipment difficult. A knee that can’t handle aggressive skis. A back that needs something more forgiving. Wagner’s ability to adjust flex patterns and geometry to accommodate these constraints turns skiing from painful to possible.
What connects both groups is that they know enough about skiing to articulate what they want. The Skier DNA process works best when you can describe what you liked about previous skis, what frustrated you, how you want your next pair to feel different. If you’re still figuring out your skiing style, Wagner will build you excellent skis – but you might not yet know how to specify what “excellent” means for you.
The price makes sense in that context. If you ski 10 days per season on rental equipment, custom skis are probably overkill. If you ski 50 days per season and plan to keep the same skis for eight years, spending $2,000 on equipment that’s precisely matched to your needs starts looking reasonable. Especially compared to buying three pairs of $700 skis over that same period, none of which feel quite right.
The Race Room for Everyone Else
Professional ski racers don’t use off-the-rack equipment. They ski in “race rooms” – dedicated shops within larger factories where technicians build custom skis tailored to specific athletes, specific courses, specific snow conditions. They adjust flex patterns for the racer’s weight and strength. They tweak sidecut for the racer’s turn shape. They build skis that amplify the racer’s strengths and compensate for their weaknesses.
Wagner’s model is essentially: what if everyone had access to a race room?
The equipment matters more than the ski industry generally admits. Skiing on skis that match your biomechanics and style feels fundamentally different from skiing on skis that sort of work. Turns require less effort. Balance feels natural. The skis respond the way you expect them to respond, which creates a feedback loop where technique improves because the equipment isn’t fighting you.
This isn’t about buying performance. You can’t purchase better skiing through more expensive equipment. But you can remove the friction that comes from equipment mismatch. You can make skiing feel the way it’s supposed to feel – fluid, intuitive, effortless.
That’s what Wagner spent seven years writing code to achieve. That’s what the major ski manufacturers told him nobody wanted. That’s what he built a solar-powered factory in Telluride to prove them wrong about.
Seventy days on the wrong skis taught Pete Wagner something the industry had forgotten: equipment fit matters. Not as marketing copy, but as physics. The right ski for you is demonstrably different from the right ski for someone else, and that difference is measurable, quantifiable, buildable.
Nearly two decades and more than 15,000 pairs of skis later, the model that shouldn’t work still does. Six skis per day, each one different, each one designed for a specific human being who wants skiing to feel like it should.
The major manufacturers still aren’t interested. Their customers, apparently, are.
Read more great Skiing and Snowboarding articles from Radnut HERE
